Skip to content
Instajet— Private aviation news and intelligence

Methodology

How the programme data is collected and ranked

Every jet card, membership and fractional programme figure on Instajet is an operator's own published term, linked to where it is published and dated. This page sets out how those terms are gathered, what we show when an operator does not publish one, and exactly how our comparisons and rankings are computed from them — so that any position on this site can be checked by a reader with the same sources.

Collection

Where the data comes from

Only what an operator has published, in a place a reader can open.

Each value is taken from one of five kinds of source: the operator’s own website, a PDF the operator publishes (rate sheets, programme guides, terms and conditions), a press release, a contract filed publicly, or a regulatory filing. These are the only source types our records accept.

Every value is stored with the address of the page that states it, the page’s date and the kind of source it is, and every programme page links each figure to its source. A value without a source and a date cannot be saved as published: the database refuses it.

Some values are found with the help of AI research tools. Such a value is recorded only against a page that states it, with the exact wording kept for the reviewer, and the programme stays off the site until a person has reviewed it. No programme’s terms appear publicly before a person at Instajet sets it live.

What we do not use

  • Paywalled or subscription datasets, from anyone. We do not buy, license or copy third-party programme data, and nothing on this site is drawn from a paywalled comparison or ranking service.
  • Other publications' figures, rankings or ratings, including other comparison sites.
  • Quotes obtained from brokers or sales teams, which are not published and cannot be checked by a reader.
  • Figures recalled by a person or a language model. A value is entered against a page that states it, or it is not entered.

Disclosure

What each state means

Four states, and the site never lets one stand in for another.

A published value
The operator states the term, and we show it with a link to the page it is stated on and that page's date. The date is the source's own — the date the page carries, or the date it was read where it carries none — never the date we last opened our records, which would make an old figure look fresh.
Not publicly disclosed
We looked, and the operator does not publish the term. That is an answer, not a gap: it is the question to ask on a sales call. Where we recorded the page we checked, it is linked.
Needs re-verification
We hold a published value but do not stand behind it today: a reviewer rated it low, or its source is over 36 months old. The figure is not shown, and it is not used in any comparison or ranking until a newer source is recorded.
Nothing shown
We have not yet researched the term. The page shows nothing at all rather than an empty cell, because a blank beside a label reads as "this programme has none" — a claim nobody checked.

Each published value also carries a confidence. A source over 18 months old can be at most medium confidence, and over 36 months it is low and hidden, as above. Ageing is applied every time a page is built, so an old figure drops out on schedule without anyone having to remember it.

Re-verification

How often it is checked again

Operators change their terms without notice, so a figure is only as good as the last time someone re-read its source.

Every programme is on a 90-day re-verification cycle by default: a person re-reads its sources, updates any term that has changed, and marks it verified. Each programme’s page states when that last happened and its interval. A programme that has not been re-verified since its values were entered says so rather than showing an entry date.

Re-verification is recorded only by that explicit step. Editing one value does not mark a whole programme verified, and every change to a value is kept in its revision history.

Rankings

How rankings are computed

By rule, from stored fields. No editorial view of which programme is better, and no model's judgement, enters a position.

We rank on published terms because they are the one thing an operator and a reader can both check. A ranking an operator disputes is then a disagreement about a term it published and a rule stated here — both correctable — rather than about our opinion. These are the rules every ranking follows:

  1. Every criterion is a stored field. A category whose criteria cannot be computed from what we store is not published — however useful it would be.
  2. A condition (Europe in the service area, for example) decides which programmes a ranking is about. Programmes that do not meet it are outside that ranking, not marked down by it.
  3. Missing data keeps a programme out; it is never filled in. A term we have not researched, or whose value is awaiting re-verification, excludes the programme, and the ranking lists it with that reason.
  4. Where a criterion is required, a programme whose operator does not publish it is excluded and listed. Where it is not required, the programme is ranked and scores nothing on that term: an unpublished term earns no credit.
  5. On each term, the best value among the ranked programmes scores full points and the weakest scores none, with the rest placed in proportion between them. When every ranked programme has the same value, all score full points.
  6. A programme's score is the weighted sum, out of 100. Each roundup prints every term's weight, and every programme's points on every term.
  7. Ties are listed alphabetically by programme name, so the order is the same on every build.
  8. Amounts are never converted between currencies. A ranking on money names its currency, and a programme priced in another is listed as not ranked, with that reason.
  9. Only programmes on sale are ranked. A discontinued programme keeps its own page but stands in no ranking.
  10. A ranking is published only when at least 5 programmes can be ranked. A shorter list is better served by our head-to-head comparisons.
  11. Every sentence a ranking page writes about a programme is checked automatically before the page is built: each figure must equal the stored value; a word like “lowest” must belong to the programme that actually holds the lowest value under the stated criteria; and no line may characterise an operator except by restating its own published terms. A page that fails is not published.

Best Jet Cards

Jet card programmes · at least 5 ranked to publish

  • Guaranteed availability · 25% of the score. Yes scores more than No. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Peak days per year · 25% of the score. A lower figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Hours / funds expiry · 25% of the score. A higher figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Terms published · 25% of the score. More terms published scores more. Counted for every programme.

Not published yet. Too few programmes can be ranked yet: 0 of the 5 it needs before we publish it.

Best Jet Cards for Europe

Jet card programmes · at least 5 ranked to publish

  • Service area. A condition: the published list must include Europe. A programme that does not publish it is not ranked, and the ranking lists it with that reason.
  • Guaranteed availability · 25% of the score. Yes scores more than No. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Peak days per year · 25% of the score. A lower figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Hours / funds expiry · 25% of the score. A higher figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Terms published · 25% of the score. More terms published scores more. Counted for every programme.

Not published yet. Too few programmes can be ranked yet: 0 of the 5 it needs before we publish it.

Cheapest Jet Cards

Jet card programmes · compared in USD · at least 5 ranked to publish

  • Minimum purchase, amount · 100% of the score. A lower figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it is not ranked, and the ranking lists it with that reason.

Not published yet. Too few programmes can be ranked yet: 0 of the 5 it needs before we publish it.

Best Private Jet Memberships

Membership programmes · at least 5 ranked to publish

  • Guaranteed availability · 25% of the score. Yes scores more than No. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Peak days per year · 25% of the score. A lower figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Hours / funds expiry · 25% of the score. A higher figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Terms published · 25% of the score. More terms published scores more. Counted for every programme.

Not published yet. Too few programmes can be ranked yet: 0 of the 5 it needs before we publish it.

Jet Cards With Guaranteed Availability

Jet card programmes · at least 5 ranked to publish

  • Guaranteed availability. A condition: the published value must be Yes. A programme that does not publish it is not ranked, and the ranking lists it with that reason.
  • Peak days per year · 33.3% of the score. A lower figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Hours / funds expiry · 33.3% of the score. A higher figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.
  • Terms published · 33.3% of the score. More terms published scores more. Counted for every programme.

Not published yet. Too few programmes can be ranked yet: 0 of the 5 it needs before we publish it.

Jet Cards With the Fewest Peak Days

Jet card programmes · at least 5 ranked to publish

  • Peak days per year · 100% of the score. A lower figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it is not ranked, and the ranking lists it with that reason.

Not published yet. Too few programmes can be ranked yet: 0 of the 5 it needs before we publish it.

Best Jet Cards for Occasional Flyers

Jet card programmes · at least 5 ranked to publish

  • Minimum purchase, hours · 66.7% of the score. A lower figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it is not ranked, and the ranking lists it with that reason.
  • Hours / funds expiry · 33.3% of the score. A higher figure scores more. A programme that does not publish it scores nothing on this term; one we have not yet researched is not ranked.

Not published yet. Too few programmes can be ranked yet: 0 of the 5 it needs before we publish it.

Jet Card vs Fractional Ownership is not ranked: comparing two ways of buying flying is an explainer, not a list, and belongs with our guides.

Corrections

How to report an error

Operators and readers both.

If a figure is wrong, out of date, or attributed to the wrong source, use the corrections form. Name the programme and the term, and give the address where the correct term is published. We change a value only against a published source — the same standard every value met to be entered — and every comparison and ranking that uses it is recomputed from the corrected value.

If you represent an operator and a term is shown as not publicly disclosed, the fastest correction is to publish it: send us the page, and it will be recorded with its source like any other. Corrections to published reporting are logged on the corrections page; how articles are written is set out in the editorial policy.